Search results

sure but the question is if Optimus will be able irking gigafactories next year

Can’t believe that Optimus question is so high

At this point, I think he’ll be compelled to discuss insider delivery timing, etc., to a greater degree than normal. technically, nothing to back-pedal or explain because in the Q2 he said “before end of the year” But there’ll pressure to explain how there’s not any material problem causing...

obviously not too obvious, at least to me ? funny choice, for a place that doesn’t build any Plaid? maybe it’s the thought that counts

maybe so but I'd *think* the engineers at Tesla could solve for this very basic problem - the right sort of ramp fixes it but, if they don't plan to put vehicles there, it becomes a strange feature to have in the front of the building - the obviously don't expect it to be a walkway

This has been rattling around in my head for several weeks, having back then seen the new GFTX entrance design from flyovers by Joe, as well as images shared by Musk. Maybe this has been obvious to others, and I simply haven't seen it mentioned (because it's so obvious?), but to...

interesting take if it’s true that no manufacturer wants to pay for a CT tear down report (which as I remember it costs ~6 figures), then I suppose if fans want to pay for it… on the other hand, if fans pay for the CT then later a manufacture (or 10) come along and pay for the CT report… he...

if you view that contingent event occurring at a specific point in time as being attributable only to that point in time, then I guess that’s one way to look at it having negotiated things like this myself, they were aware that the market cap trigger need not be maintained for any period to...

How’s that? Wasn’t it largely a market cap trigger. Where can I find the details of his comp package you’re referencing?

I didn’t say ‘both’ in any event, your points are well taken and good context that is relevant to honing in on the relevant critics of the Lucid package I intended to compare Musk’s comp package that year as an example of how these comp packages are hard to judge when cherry picked or...

Which is all my original comment was attempting to say I said it’s still nutty money was adding only that knowing exactly how nutty, in which ways, takes digging into the details to repeat (a third time), I’m not trying to defend the package - that would be dumb instead that “he made X when...

Yes, minced words with the prior revenue statement bad compare on my part

if optics is all your orig post was driving at, it wasn’t clear and I’m not saying there aren’t notable differences, but: Tesla made $12B in revenue in 2022, so Musk’s 2022 compensation was 182% of that Bad optics fine. Different from my post saying these comp packages are complicated and...

seems like it is because you say things like: you’re treating it as though it’s pay based on 2022 performance or production But it very well could be a term from his joining in 2019, that if by X date the market cap of company is Y, then his payout will be based on Z and to repeat, I’m...

I don’t know Irrelevant to decorum though

these exec comp packages can be misleading and confusing. In 2022 Musk made zero at Tesla. but in 2021 Musk made $23.5 billion in stock options Sort of similarly, Lucid’s CEO had a market cap performance target in his deal, which market cap target he hit last year (to be paid this year)...

Of course Tesla xwitter is 80% this rn

Fanboi’s attack!!

I seem to remember them having these a long while back would explain the old design getting rid of old stock

seems right. At least interesting to see where their head is pointed it’s in the book as well apparently