Search results

Okay. Then you agree: Tesla has sold enough cars. Apparently those of us who bought less than average priced cars only get used EVs, and the total fleet won't ever get to more than this. ?‍♀️ No more hotels need chargers. No more automakers need to integrate with them. And Tesla will never...

Disagree on what, though? We already know that Superrcharger expansion has come to a halt. And if this is true, Tesla violated labor law by letting so many go at once without notice to the relevant agencies that need to be ready for it. Not that the statutory penalties for such violations...

First off, a company exists because of its people. It can limp along as a zombie for years, but without people, it's nothing. Secondly... No, it's not. Unless you think that this is as many EVs as the US will ever have, and no more, and you want to roll-back adoption. 10% of new vehicles...

There are many things you shouldn't be trusting him on, but this is going to be a big one. ...Before the launch of your newest charger, before you know the untime rate of it, you fire your development team? ...Before you complete your new compatibility testing and integration of new companies...

There's never been a time I was worried they'd lay off the Supercharger team or sideline the next vehicle, either. -Crissa

I can't imagine what this is supposed to do... is he trying to see if it's possible to get a supermajority to vote against his compensation? -Crissa

What are we disagreeing on, though? -Crissa

I also fail to see the fiduciary responsibility when the company is sitting on monies that are shrinking by 4% when it could be planning on future returns by investing in more factories. It's not like building these factories is going to get cheaper or coming into a crowded market will make...

Sorry, there's nothing in that article I can see that contradicts Elon. I didn't read the whole thing, since it just seemed the same stuff over again when I got down about eight paragraphs. They fired basically everyone on the Supercharger team and the Destination team except those who were on...

?‍♀️ Apparently. -Crissa

My Mazda came with a tray like this, really helpful! -Crissa

...So you found nothing? Weird. I thought you said you found something wrong with the video. -Crissa

You didn't find anything wrong with the video, though. -Crissa

And if they didn't have the relevant training, I would doubt their instructions. Which seems obvious, right? -Crissa

So, more straw man argument. Because your feelings are hurt. Got it. -Crissa

Noted, @M0unt41nm4n you're still making a straw man argument to defend the decision of a specific UK fire department. 'Cause that's what the thread is about. ?‍♀️ Why do you think I'm arguing against using water? -Crissa

Noted, you're arguing with other firefighters quoted in the news program. And making up straw man arguments. Seems like you're hurting. Because there's no reason why you should be defending a stupid decision by a UK fire department. -Crissa

So... you didn't find anything wrong in this conversation other than I hurt your feelings by knowing something and not respecting your false authority. Gallons per hour isn't the same as putting it in the right spot. You're making the same error that was called out in the video I linked. The...

Well, then what have I said that's wrong, aside from your fallacy or authority? (Since we're doing fallacy education here) Because it seems like you're using the wrong hose for this argument. -Crissa

Because you don't want to send a non-hazmat team to a hazmat fire, you don't bring a team trained for pallet fires to lead the suppression of a metal fire. A fire fighter trained for wildfire inclines is different than a fire fighter trained for attic ingress. The techniques that work on one...